the story is not over

Dear friends,

The one-year anniversary of the earthquake that devastated Port-au-Prince has come and gone. As you might imagine, Haiti was a busier place last week, filled with journalists and others who were interested in commemorating the event. If, as I was, you were alarmed at the velocity at which Haiti disappeared from the news only weeks after the earthquake hit last year, you probably won't be surprised too hear that the exodus of journalists out of Port-au-Prince was significantly quicker this year. After a smattering of articles and op-eds lamenting the essentially failed efforts to reconstruct over the past year, Haiti has once again faded from the headlines.

There is, however, another story that is still happening here. The presidential elections of November 28th, by nearly all measures, were a failure. All of you who are receiving this letter are original signers of a petition to postpone those elections until certain criteria were met. Well, the criteria were not met, the elections went on as planned and the end result was not very surprising. The Center for Economic & Policy Research (CEPR) released a report detailing all of the irregularities of the elections and reasons for which they should not be legitimated. (The report itself is a bit of a long read. For a quick, yet thorough, overview of the problems, please see CEPR's press release as well.)

While the actual election-day irregularities are enough to call into question the validity of the elections, it is important to remember that the elections were flawed before the first ballot was even cast. While you, as an original signer of the petition, will be familiar with some of the fatal flaws, we have been continuing to fight to get the word out. The latest step has been the publication of an op-ed by RPCV Keane Bhatt in the St. Petersburg Times, the hyperlinked copy of which is pasted below. (We, too, were a little confused at the life-sized portrait of Keane at the head of the article, but I'm sure he's got plenty of fans in the Tampa Bay area now.) It highlights the reasons for which the elections were not legitimate and describes the Unites States' moral duty to insist on and fund a do-over election. It's a worthwhile read.

As concerned U.S. citizens who, like so many, have a place in our hearts for Haiti, it can be terribly frustrating to stand by as Haiti is continually crippled by things both natural (earthquakes, cholera) and unnatural (political unrest). However, while we may not be able to do anything to prevent hurricanes from arriving on Haiti's shores, we do have an influence in other ways. We are fortunate to be able to express ourselves openly, to be active, and to influence our political affairs. These are things that I, at least, have taken for granted in the past. After several months of living in Port-au-Prince, I see a different reality for many Haitians, who are prevented from practicing these most basic democratic activities for many reasons, not the least of which are economic hardship and political exclusion. We should use our great influence, as U.S. citizens, in service of those who do not have those same rights.

This story is not over. The election review is still in process, and nobody is quite sure which direction the Haitian government and international overseers will take. In a shift, the U.S. government has announced that it could reject the original election results, pending the results of the review. This means that there is still a chance that the elections could be re-done in a way that is fair, free, and inclusive, which is what we have been fighting for from the very beginning.

What can you do to help?

• Add your name to this petition, which asks Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills and the U.S. State Department to withdraw their support of the fraudulent elections.
• Call or write your Senator or Representative.
• Write your local newspaper. As RPCVs, we are respected members of the communities where we live. Give it a try, I think you'll be surprised at the positive results.
• Ask your friends and family to support the petition.
• At a University? Hold an event, start a discussion group, start an on-campus petition.

Together we can make this happen. Thank you for your continued support and, as always, for standing with Haiti.

All my best,

David

----

Hyperlinked copy of Keane's op-ed:

Only new, fair voting can help Haiti now

By Keane Bhatt

It is bad enough that, by delaying reconstruction aid to Haiti, the United States has failed to give adequate assistance to our neighbor, which was struck by a devastating earthquake one year ago. It is far worse that we have also actively cooperated in its deeply flawed election. Our government helped impose an election process upon the Haitian people that gave rise to foreseeable human rights violations, and is therefore complicit in the resulting harm. Having helped fund and organize the elections, the United States should support a fair and inclusive do-over, if only to rectify its wrong.

Three fatal flaws in the electoral process were known well in advance of the fraudulent Nov. 28 elections. First, Haiti's Provisional Electoral Council, the organization tasked with supervising the elections, was hopelessly compromised by conflict of interest. President Rene Preval, who championed his "hand-picked successor" Jude Celestin during the elections, had also hand-selected the nine members of the council. Second, the council banned the participation of 15 political parties—including Fanmi Lavalas, the most popular party in the country—without offering a valid reason. Third, it was obvious the government would fail to provide all internally displaced people with identification necessary to vote. This much was already clear when the United States enthusiastically invested at least $14 million into the election process.

By cooperating in an enterprise that guaranteed exclusion, the United States implicated itself in the violation of Haitians' human right to fair elections. This infringement was the root cause of the uproar that followed. Human decisions—not nature—led to the predictable injuries and deaths. The United States had a moral obligation to demand the implementation of inclusive and democratic policies in exchange for its decisive support. It did not do so.

For months before the elections, the State Department stalled and equivocated in the face of prominent objections and appeals. Forty-five members of Congress signed an urgent letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton calling for her to address the three flaws. Republican Sen. Richard Lugar, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Relations, criticized the exclusions and warned of potential chaos. Paul Farmer, U.N. deputy special envoy to Haiti, expressed his concern that "all Haitian people and parties be allowed to participate."

More than two dozen nongovernmental organizations and church groups with intimate knowledge of Haitian politics and society sent Clinton a letter with detailed prescriptions to mitigate the disaster. As a group of over 120 returned Peace Corps volunteers who served in the neighboring Dominican Republic, my colleagues and I also petitioned her. The State Department studiously ignored such pleas.

On Nov. 7, President Obama eloquently denounced the sham elections that occurred in Burma, which suffered from similar failings. In contrast, Obama made no appeal to resolve the Haitian electoral defects despite the moral responsibility arising from having funded an election that would predictably trigger political crisis and violence. The United States failed to use its uniquely influential position as the election's largest financier.

The media, with few exceptions, followed Obama's lead. They missed the intrinsic defects of the election preparations and were therefore shocked by the ensuing catastrophe. While clearly documenting widespread ballot stuffing, outdated voter lists, and other irregularities, the media hardly mentioned the elections' structural fraudulence: the exclusion of both voters and parties. Most reporting has focused on the maneuverings of three preapproved candidates as they dispute minuscule percentages of the votes of less than one quarter of Haiti's eligible voters. This attention falsely suggests that recounts and runoff rounds can somehow produce a legitimate president.

Further invalidating the process, the United Nations threatened to withhold resources if the elections are not accepted. It also inveigled two front-runners into withdrawing their principled calls to annul the elections. Despite this, over half of the candidates still demand annulment.

Our failure to refrain from causing foreseeable harm obligates us to undertake remedial efforts. The United States, along with the other underwriters of the elections, should finance a do-over that includes all political parties and voters, headed by a new, credible Provisional Electoral Council. While $30 millionfor new elections may seem costly, the Haitian government must have a democratic mandate to manage issues like public health and the investment of billions of dollars of aid. Furthermore, this price tag amounts to less than two weeks of the U.N. security force's proposed budget for 2011.

Only new, fair elections can lead to a just outcome. Let's insist that our government take responsibility for its moral failure and offer logistical and financial support to carry out inclusive elections in Haiti.

Keane Bhatt served in the Dominican Republic as a Peace Corps volunteer from 2008 to 2010. He helped organize the returned Peace Corps volunteers' petition to Hillary Clinton. Please add your name to the thousands demanding that the U.S. support inclusive elections in Haiti at http://bit.ly/fairelection.